ai mafia and fare kickbacks

Would it be fair to implement a system that pays a small percentage to artists or creatives every time their work is used in a derivative work by AI?

For instance, the inventor of paper cup holders became a millionaire from the accumulation of fractions of a cent profits from billions of drinks sold worldwide.

However, in recent years, tech companies have used vast amounts of data produced by individuals to train large AI models without a concent - https://x.com/zemotion/status/1800959538381848927. In the New York Times v. OpenAI case, Microsoft intervened to defend OpenAI and protect their investment, raising questions about the kind of justice individual artists can expect when even large media publications face threats. To promote the use of AI systems and generate revenue, some companies have developed systems that mimic the voices of celebrities, such as Scarlett Johansson, reminiscent of the movie "HER." - meaning that even if you are a celebrity you are not consulted prior to public release of such system.

Who gets the dividends from the earnings generated by AI? Is it fair to leave most people behind and compensate only a select few?